<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Capitalism on flow</title><link>https://eric.harris-braun.com/blog/tags/capitalism/</link><description>Recent content in Capitalism on flow</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://eric.harris-braun.com/blog/tags/capitalism/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Phronesis and the Internet: the Process Revolution</title><link>https://eric.harris-braun.com/blog/2006/07/12/phronesis-and-the-internet-the-process-revolution/</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://eric.harris-braun.com/blog/2006/07/12/phronesis-and-the-internet-the-process-revolution/</guid><description>&lt;p>I learned about the Aristotelean intellectual virtue of &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phronesis" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">phronesis&lt;/a> along with the related term &lt;em>episteme&lt;/em> a few years back from Kathryn Montgomery in discussions about her book &lt;em>&lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0195187121" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">How Doctors Think&lt;/a>&lt;/em>. &lt;em>Episteme&lt;/em> is the scientific rationality we are all quite familiar with. Phronesis is usually translated &amp;ldquo;practical wisdom&amp;rdquo; and is the kind of rational skill doctors and entrepreneurs have that is based on experiential knowledge and provides the ability to take the best action in particular circumstances. We are much less likely to have thought of this as a separate kind of rational capacity. These terms came up again recently for me in the context of a &lt;a href="http://www.thetransitioner.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">collective intelligence&lt;/a> discussion, which really set my mind going and has led me to some propositions and a conjecture:&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>