<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Trust on flow</title><link>https://eric.harris-braun.com/blog/tags/trust/</link><description>Recent content in Trust on flow</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://eric.harris-braun.com/blog/tags/trust/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>community currency and trust</title><link>https://eric.harris-braun.com/blog/2006/12/12/community-currency-and-trust/</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://eric.harris-braun.com/blog/2006/12/12/community-currency-and-trust/</guid><description>&lt;p>When ever I introduce people to the idea of community currencies, I have experienced that the question of trust comes up again and again. This is reasonable, but I&amp;rsquo;m quite convinced that the breadth and depth of what trust is, is very poorly understood. Trust seems to be a word that, in the case of money, is hiding at least two forms of something that are actually quite disparate. I think this is because experientially, these forms of trust feel the same, but they arise from entirely separate circumstances. Some examples to get at this:&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>